Part forty-three of a tour through Greek inflectional morphology to help get students thinking more systematically about the word forms they see (and maybe teach a bit of general linguistics along the way).

Before we get to counts in the various aorist classes, we need to dive a little more into the verbs that appear to be in more than one class.

We've already seen the kappa aorists like ἔδωκα and ἔθηκα that, in the infinitive (and, classically, in the plural), are root aorists but elsewhere have alphathematic endings and a slightly different stem.

In this post we're going to look at the aorist active verbs in the SBLGNT that have a consistent stem throughout but exhibit both thematic (2nd aorist) and alphathematic (1st aorist) variants. In other words, for some cells in the paradigm there is a form that follows the thematic distinguisher pattern, for some cells there is a form that follows the alphathematic distinguisher pattern, and in some cells we find both forms. In theory, both forms might be possible in any cell, but we're just using a small corpus so in practice the paradigms will be sparse.

In all cases, the thematic aorist is the older form and the alphathematic form developed later (particularly during the Hellenistic period) as part of a general movement towards having fewer classes of aorist.

Note that the 3SG ending -ε(ν) is ambiguous as to which class the form is in (between these two classes).

I should also note that the stem and its relationship to the imperfective stem can be used as a diagnostic for aorist class. But we are ignoring that for now and just focusing on the classes of ending (or more precisely, the distinguishers).

The relevant verbs are:

  • ἔρχομαι/ἦλθον and compounds
  • λέγω/εἶπον and compounds
  • φέρω/ἤνεγκα compounds
  • πίπτω/ἔπεσα and compounds
  • βάλλω/ἔβαλον and compounds
  • εὑρίσκω/εὗρον
  • ὁράω/εἶδον
  • ἀναιρέω/ἀνεῖλον

ἔρχομαι/ἦλθον and compounds

The alphathematic variants seem more likely in the plural (although we'll defer any actual statistics for now).

Note these could not be reanalyzed as sigmatic or pseudo-sigmatic.

thematic alphathematic
INF ἐλθεῖν
1SG ἦλθον
2SG ἦλθες
3SG ἦλθε(ν)
1PL ἤλθομεν ἤλθαμεν
2PL ἤλθατε
3PL ἦλθον ἦλθαν
thematic alphathematic
INF ἀπελθεῖν
1SG ἀπῆλθον ἀπῆλθα
3SG ἀπῆλθε(ν)
3PL ἀπῆλθον ἀπῆλθαν
thematic alphathematic
INF εἰσελθεῖν
1SG εἰσῆλθον
2SG εἰσῆλθες
3SG εἰσῆλθε(ν)
1PL εἰσήλθομεν
2PL εἰσήλθατε
3PL εἰσῆλθον
thematic alphathematic
INF ἐξελθεῖν
1SG ἐξῆλθον
2SG ἐξῆλθες
3SG ἐξῆλθε(ν)
1PL ἐξήλθομεν
2PL ἐξήλθατε
3PL ἐξῆλθον ἐξῆλθαν
thematic alphathematic
3SG προσῆλθε(ν)
3PL προσῆλθον προσῆλθαν
thematic alphathematic
INF συνελθεῖν
3SG συνῆλθε(ν)
3PL συνῆλθον συνῆλθαν

λέγω/εἶπον and compounds

Note these could not be reanalyzed as sigmatic or pseudo-sigmatic.

thematic alphathematic
INF εἰπεῖν
1SG εἶπον εἶπα
2SG εἶπες εἶπας
3SG εἶπε(ν)
2PL εἴπατε
3PL εἶπον εἶπαν
thematic alphathematic
1SG προεῖπον
3SG προεῖπε(ν)
1PL προείπαμεν

φέρω/ἤνεγκα compounds

Note the stem ends in a kappa and so it resembles a kappa aorist when alphathematic. It is therefore particularly interesting that the indicatives are all alphathematic (or in the case of the 3SG, could be taken as in that class).

In other words, the existence of the kappa may have made speakers feel a little more comfortable using the alpha endings.

thematic alphathematic
INF ἀνενεγκεῖν ἀνενέγκαι
3SG ἀνήνεγκε(ν)
thematic alphathematic
INF ἀπενεγκεῖν
3SG ἀπήνεγκε(ν)
3PL ἀπήνεγκαν
thematic alphathematic
INF εἰσενεγκεῖν
1PL εἰσηνέγκαμεν
thematic alphathematic
INF ὑπενεγκεῖν
1SG ὑπήνεγκα

πίπτω/ἔπεσα and compounds

Note the stem ends in a sigma and so it resembles a sigmatic aorist when alphathematic. As with ἤνεγκα, it is therefore interesting that the indicatives are all alphathematic (or in the case of the 3SG, could be taken as in that class).

In other words, the existence of the sigma may have made speakers feel a little more comfortable using the alpha endings.

thematic alphathematic
INF πεσεῖν
1SG ἔπεσα
3SG ἔπεσε(ν)
3PL ἔπεσαν
thematic alphathematic
INF ἀναπεσεῖν
3SG ἀνέπεσε(ν)
3PL ἀνέπεσαν
thematic alphathematic
INF ἐκπεσεῖν
3SG ἐξέπεσε(ν)
2PL ἐξεπέσατε
3PL ἐξέπεσαν
thematic alphathematic
3SG ἐπέπεσε(ν)
3PL ἐπέπεσαν
thematic alphathematic
3SG προσέπεσε(ν)
3PL προσέπεσαν

βάλλω/ἔβαλον and compounds

Notice that, as often has been the case before, the 3PL appears in both classes. In a future post we'll run some numbers as it could just be that the 3PL is simply more common in general.

The stem here ends in a resonant, so the alphathematics look a little more like pseudo-sigmatics.

thematic alphathematic
INF βαλεῖν
3SG ἔβαλε(ν)
3PL ἔβαλον ἔβαλαν
thematic alphathematic
INF ἐπιβαλεῖν
3SG ἐπέβαλε(ν)
3PL ἐπέβαλον ἐπέβαλαν

εὑρίσκω/εὗρον

The stem here ends in a resonant, so the alphathematics look a little more like pseudo-sigmatics.

thematic alphathematic
INF εὑρεῖν
1SG εὗρον
2SG εὗρες
3SG εὗρε(ν)
1PL εὕρομεν εὕραμεν
3PL εὗρον

ὁράω/εἶδον

Note that, like λέγω/εἶπον, these could not be reanalyzed as sigmatic or pseudo-sigmatic.

thematic alphathematic
INF ἰδεῖν
1SG εἶδον
2SG εἶδες
3SG εἶδε(ν)
1PL εἴδομεν εἴδαμεν
2PL εἴδετε
3PL εἶδον εἶδαν

ἀναιρέω/ἀνεῖλον

The stem here ends in a resonant, so the alphathematics look a little more like pseudo-sigmatics.

thematic alphathematic
INF ἀνελεῖν
2SG ἀνεῖλες
3SG ἀνεῖλε(ν)
2PL ἀνείλατε
3PL ἀνεῖλαν

In the next post, we'll cover other aorist active verbs that have some variant forms. Then we'll be in a position to do some counts.